Informational only. Not medical advice.INFORMATIONAL PLATFORM ONLY — NOT MEDICAL ADVICE, DIAGNOSIS, OR TREATMENT
Informational only. Not medical advice.INFORMATIONAL PLATFORM ONLY — NOT MEDICAL ADVICE, DIAGNOSIS, OR TREATMENT
🚧 Not live yet — independent testing is in planning
Leave your email below if you’d like to be notified when it launches. Honest expectation: months out, not weeks.
The plan: route samples to accredited analytical labs and publish the full Certificate of Analysis — purity (HPLC), identity (mass spec or FTIR), endotoxin (USP <85>), microbial (USP <61>/<71>), heavy metals (ICP-MS), and net peptide content (mg per vial). Open methodology, never vendor-funded. Not live yet.
The Disclosed Trust Index — vendor trust scores computed from every Certificate of Analysis we can index across the peptide vendor landscape. Purity, safety-panel coverage, lab corroboration, and forgery-risk signals, recomputed nightly.
COA aggregation is informative but ultimately downstream of what vendors and labs choose to publish. Most vendor COAs cover HPLC purity. Few cover endotoxin (USP <85>). Even fewer cover microbial limits, heavy metals, or disclose net peptide content (mg per vial).
An independent testing arm would let us close the gap — pull samples blind, route to an accredited lab, publish every result (passes and failures), and tie those results back into the same trust-score math the corpus already feeds. The goal is a public corpus of analytical data that the research market can rely on without trusting any single source.
One email when the program goes live. No spam. No interim marketing pings.
Disclosed Labs